<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Competitive Strategy on Rational America</title><link>https://RationalAmerica.com/tags/competitive-strategy/</link><description>Recent content in Competitive Strategy on Rational America</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 09:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://RationalAmerica.com/tags/competitive-strategy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Are You Competing Like It's Chess When It's Actually Poker?</title><link>https://RationalAmerica.com/posts/are-you-competing-like-its-chess-when-its-actual/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://RationalAmerica.com/posts/are-you-competing-like-its-chess-when-its-actual/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="are-you-competing-like-its-chess-when-its-actually-poker"&gt;Are you competing like it&amp;rsquo;s chess when it&amp;rsquo;s actually poker?&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;I ask because the answer probably explains your last strategic surprise. When a rival cuts prices, launches into your segment or makes a move that seems personally insulting, you default to a story about their irrationality. &amp;ldquo;They&amp;rsquo;re leaving money on the table,&amp;rdquo; you tell the board. &amp;ldquo;They don&amp;rsquo;t understand their own costs.&amp;rdquo; Then the next quarter arrives and they&amp;rsquo;re still doing it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>