<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Misinformation on Rational America</title><link>https://RationalAmerica.com/tags/misinformation/</link><description>Recent content in Misinformation on Rational America</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 09:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://RationalAmerica.com/tags/misinformation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How to Evaluate Government Claims with Scientific Skepticism (Without Becoming a Cynic)</title><link>https://RationalAmerica.com/posts/2026-09-12-how-to-evaluate-government-claims-with-scientific/</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://RationalAmerica.com/posts/2026-09-12-how-to-evaluate-government-claims-with-scientific/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What do you do when a government press release lands in your feed at 6pm and makes an enormous promise? Your usual toolkit is probably one of two things: faith in the institutions, or deep suspicion of them. The first reaction is easy, too easy. So is the second. A genuinely useful third path is harder, which is why I’ll lay it out here.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Scientific skepticism is not a job title or a personality trait. It is a set of learned behaviors, and they can be applied to policy claims just as they can be applied to a study about gut microbes or a claim about dietary cholesterol. Let’s unpack, then, how the method works when the thing being measured is not a molecule, but a government&amp;rsquo;s public statement.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>