<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Natural Law on Rational America</title><link>https://RationalAmerica.com/tags/natural-law/</link><description>Recent content in Natural Law on Rational America</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 09:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://RationalAmerica.com/tags/natural-law/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How to Reason Like a Natural Lawyer (Without Abandoning Rational Analysis)</title><link>https://RationalAmerica.com/posts/2026-10-23-how-to-reason-like-a-natural-lawyer-without-aband/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://RationalAmerica.com/posts/2026-10-23-how-to-reason-like-a-natural-lawyer-without-aband/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You’ve got a memo due Thursday. The precedent your partner loves runs on a sentence like, “The law will not countenance an absurd result.” In this office, that phrase is a punchline. It sounds, they say, like natural law. So you have two problems: the memo, and a vague suspicion that the man you work for is right to snort.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Natural law has an image problem. Mention it at a bar exam review or a law-and-economics lunch and you get the same eyebrow. Someone asks if you’ve met Aquinas, in a tone that suggests you’d be friends and ride a donkey together.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>