<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Regulation on Rational America</title><link>https://RationalAmerica.com/tags/regulation/</link><description>Recent content in Regulation on Rational America</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 09:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://RationalAmerica.com/tags/regulation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Never Assume Regulation Kills Efficiency if You Want a Market That Actually Works</title><link>https://RationalAmerica.com/posts/never-assume-regulation-kills-efficiency-if-you-wa/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://RationalAmerica.com/posts/never-assume-regulation-kills-efficiency-if-you-wa/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Never walk into a policy debate assuming &lt;em&gt;regulation&lt;/em&gt; is a cuss word. I get why people do it. The term conjures images of stacked paperwork, permitting delays, and some mid-level official demanding a third environmental assessment for a storage shed. That version of regulation deserves its bad reputation.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;But here&amp;rsquo;s the uncomfortable truth: every market that has ever functioned at scale has been built on a foundation of rules. Every single one. The question was never &lt;em&gt;whether&lt;/em&gt; to regulate. It was always &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;how much&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;in whose interest&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>