<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Skeptical-Inquiry on Rational America</title><link>https://RationalAmerica.com/tags/skeptical-inquiry/</link><description>Recent content in Skeptical-Inquiry on Rational America</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 09:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://RationalAmerica.com/tags/skeptical-inquiry/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>What Happens When Democracy Stops Asking Questions</title><link>https://RationalAmerica.com/posts/2026-10-24-what-happens-when-democracy-stops-asking-questions/</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://RationalAmerica.com/posts/2026-10-24-what-happens-when-democracy-stops-asking-questions/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="what-happens-when-democracy-stops-asking-questions"&gt;What happens when democracy stops asking questions&lt;/h1&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The headline arrived with all the markings of a firing squad. “COURT RULES ELECTION RESULTS VOID.” All caps. An unverified account with a blue checkmark that had been purchased. A share count that suggested thousands had already amplified it before anyone thought to stop.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;In the three seconds it took me to read it, my reflex was to feel alarm. Then the algorithm waited for me to click. But I didn’t. I’d seen that same account post the same headline last month, with slightly different dates and different names for the imaginary judges involved.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>